Legal Opinion
California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 3, 2014No. Case No. 2:13-cv-07245-MRP-JEMPublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON 35 U.S.C. § 101 INELIGIBILITY
MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) has asserted U.S. Patent Nos. 7,116,710 (“the '710 patent”), 7,421,-032 (“the '032 patent”), 7,916,781 (“the '781 patent”), and 8,284,833 (“the '833 patent,”) against Defendants Hughes Communications, Inc., Hughes Network Systems, LLC, DISH Network Corporation, DISH Network L.L.C., and dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C. (collectively, “Hughes”). The Court issued a claim construction order on August 6,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- In re TLI Communications LLC Patent LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- In Re: Marco Guldenaar Holding B.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.