Legal Opinion
Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 3, 2014No. Case No. 2:12-cv-07360-MRP-MRWPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON INELIGIBILITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 101
MARIANA R. PFAELZER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiff Enfish, LLC (“Enfish”) has sued Defendants Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), Fiserv, Inc., Intuit, Inc., Sage Software, Inc., and Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (collectively,. “Defendants”) for infringement of two patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,151,604 (“the '604 Patent”) and 6,163,775 (“the '775 Patent”).1 In an order issued March 31, 2014, the Court invalidated claims 1, 2, and 16 of the '604 patent as single means claims prohibited by 35…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Secured Mail Solutions LLC v. Universal Wilde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- California Institute of Technology v. Hughes Communications Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- In re TLI Communications LLC Patent LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Open Text S.A. v. Box, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. DirecTV, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.