Legal Opinion
Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 22, 2015No. C.A. No. 10-1067-LPS, C.A. No. 12-1581-LPSPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STARK, District Judge:
Pending before the Court are Defendant Symantec Corporation’s (“Symantec”) motion for patent invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (C.A. No. 10-1067 (“Symantec case”) D.I. 698) and Defendants Trend Micro Incorporated and Trend Micro, Inc. (USA)’s (“Trend Micro”) motion for judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (C.A. No. 12-1581 (“Trend Micro case”) D.I. 175) of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,460,-050 (the “ ’050 patent”), 6,073,142 (the “142 patent”), and 5,987,610 (the “’610 patent”) (collectively, “patents-in-suit”) asserted by Intellectual…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Align Tech., Inc. v. 3shapeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Twilio, Inc. v. Telesign Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Xilinx Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- MicroStrategy Inc. v. Apttus Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.