Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
Before the Court is Defendants' consolidated motions to dismiss, which contend that the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit fail to recite patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. ECF No. 71 ("Mot."). Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendants' consolidated motions to dismiss the asserted claims of the '815 Patent and the '005 Patent.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
1. The Parties
Plaintiff is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business in Bellevue, Washington. ECF No. 65 at ¶ 5.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Apple Inc. v. voip-pal.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Apple Inc v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Evolution Malta Limited, et al. v. Light & Wonder, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Evolution Malta Limited, et al. v. Light & Wonder, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.