Legal Opinion
Alvarado v. Santana-Lopez
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 20, 1984No. 81 Civ. 6838 (SWK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
The above-captioned action came before this Court upon defendants’ motion for trial by jury. For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, a prisoner, commenced this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for damages arising from an alleged beating by certain prison guards, on November 5, 1981, by filing the complaint herein. Defendants answered the complaint on December 10, 1981.
On, or about, February 3, 1984, defendants filed a demand for a jury trial, purportedly pursuant to Rule 38(a) of the Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winifred D. Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Lisette Cascone v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- William WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF ESTIMATE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Hilliard v. ScullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Reefer Express Lines v. Arkwright-Boston Manufacturers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harold J. Bellmore, Michael J. Fox, and James M. Montesanto, Harold J. Bellmore, Cross-Appellant v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Sewell v. Jefferson County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin LauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Davidson Pipe Co. v. Laventhol & HorwathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Paulissen v. US LIFE INS. CO. IN CITY OF NYDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.