Legal Opinion

Harold J. Bellmore, Michael J. Fox, and James M. Montesanto, Harold J. Bellmore, Cross-Appellant v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 6, 1986No. 312, 389, Dockets 85-7489, 85-7527PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

The major matters before us on this appeal are (1) whether the provision of the Connecticut Gasoline Dealer’s Act requiring payment of good will under certain circumstances to franchisees, Connecticut Gasoline Dealer’s Act, Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42 — 133Z (b) (Connecticut Act), is preempted by the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2841 (1982) (PMPA or Act), and (2) whether cross-appellant Harold J. Bellmore waived his right to trial by jury on the first count of his amended complaint. We hold that § 42-133Z (b) of the Connecticut Act is not preempted by the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Conboy v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Timothy O'Shea T/a Tim's Amoco v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Kehm Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API