Legal Opinion

Paulissen v. US LIFE INS. CO. IN CITY OF NY

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 13, 2002No. CV 01-07066 ABCPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESS; DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COLLINS, District Judge.

This case arises out of the refusal of Defendant United States Life Insurance Company (“U.S.Life”) to pay accidental death benefits to Plaintiff Louise Paulissen after the death of her husband, Peter Pau-lissen. Pending before the Court are three motions: Plaintiffs Motion for Jury Trial, Plaintiffs Motion to Exclude Expert Witness, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Motions came on regularly for hearing before this Court on…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Luanne Kenna Chale v. Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Scottsdale Insurance v. City of WaukeganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  3. Miller v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  4. Schar v. Hartford Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  5. Hall v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API