Legal Opinion

Howard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1993No. S-90-607PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

Under a policy of insurance issued to him by the defendant appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the plaintiff-appellant, Robert Howard, seeks to recover the damages he claims to have sustained as the result of an automobile fire. Pursuant to verdict, the district court entered judgment in favor of State Farm. Howard asserts the district court erred in (1) failing to strike certain venirepersons for cause, (2) permitting him to be improperly impeached, (3) failing to grant his motion to strike State Farm’s amended answer, (4) failing to grant his motion…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Kanzenbach v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Maack v. School District of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hamblin v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Weatherbee v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Boren v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Double K, Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gravel v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sayah v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bisgard v. JohnsonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Vergara v. Lopez-VasquezNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API