Legal Opinion

Weatherbee v. Hutcheson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1966No. 42344PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhaedt, Judge.

It is proper to qualify the jury relative to the possible interest which the members may have in an insurance carrier having a financial interest in the outcome of the suit. This will often apply to carriers of both the plaintiff and the defendant. For example, if both have liability insurance and a cross action is brought, both companies are potentially interested in the outcome. If damages are sought for injury to plaintiff’s personal property, particularly the automobile, it is not unlikely that it may be covered by collision insurance making the collision carrier, by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Farrar v. FarrarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Wallace & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Freeman v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. GossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dual S. Enterprises, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Smith v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Patterson v. LauderbackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API