Legal Opinion
Double K, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1994No. S-92-1005PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Double K, Inc., doing business as King’s Ballroom (Double K), sued Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale) seeking recovery for a fire loss suffered April 3,1986. Double K alleged that its multiperil insurance contract had been extended for an additional year by a binder issued by an independent agent who was the apparent or ostensible agent of Scottsdale at the time the binder was issued. Summary judgment was granted for Scottsdale, and Double K appeals.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
In appellate review of a summary judgment, the court views the evidence in a light most favorable to the party against whom…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commerce Savings Scottsbluff, Inc. v. F.H. Schafer Elevator, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Hawkins Construction Co. v. Reiman Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Moore v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Union Ins. Co. v. Land and Sky, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- New Light Co. v. Wells Fargo Alarm ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Jim's, Inc. v. WillmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Gravel v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Jon B. Roeder v. Metropolitan Insurance and Annuity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.