Legal Opinion

Hamblin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1933No. 28531PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action based on a group policy of life insurance and an individual certificate issued to plaintiff, who recovered judgment. Defendant has appealed.

Defendant issued to Union Pacific Railroad Company the policy in question, insuring the lives of certain of its employees. Plaintiff was one of the insured. In a rider attached to the policy, the defendant agrees “that, if any employee insured under this contract shall furnish the society with due proof that he has, before having attained the age of 70, become wholly disabled by bodily injuries or disease, and will be permanently,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Young v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  4. Ballou v. SherwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Maresh v. Peoria Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SouthSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kent v. DAIRYLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of the United States v. ThulemeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Garden v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API