Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Braga
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 13, 2003No. Civ. JFM-03-556, JFM-03-562PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Joseph C. Shultz and Kristen M. Harkum have brought these suits against Defendant FBI Agents Christopher Braga, Henry F. Hanburger, and Lawrence S. Brosnan for violation of their Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure. 1 Plaintiffs have asserted their claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging that defendants are liable for mistakenly seizing plaintiffs without probable cause. Plaintiffs further claim that Defendant Braga violated Plaintiff Schultz’s right against…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Bey v. Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Schultz v. BragaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Bretemps v. Town of BrentwoodDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Joseph C. Schultz, and Kristen M. Harkum v. Christopher Braga, and Henry F. Hanburger Lawrence S. Brosnan Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kristen M. Harkum, and Joseph C. Schultz v. Christopher Braga, and Henry F. Hanburger Lawrence S. Brosnan Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Roberson v. Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2010 H01District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.