Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2010 H01

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 25, 2013No. Case No. PWG-13-1600PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge.

This Memorandum Opinion addresses the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (‘Wells Fargo”) and Ginnie Mae REMIC Trust 2010 HOI (“Ginnie Mae”), ECF No. 5, and supporting Memorandum, ECF No. 5-1; Plaintiff Corey L. Roberson’s Response, ECF No. 8; and Defendants’ Reply, ECF No. 9. A hearing is not necessary. See Loe. R. 105.6. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss SHALL BE GRANTED. However, for the reasons stated below, Plaintiff SHALL BE GRANTED twenty-one days leave to supplement his complaint. If Plaintiff fails to file a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Parker v. American Brokers ConduitDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016