Legal Opinion

Haskins v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1998No. EAB 96-AB-199; CA A96295PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*287LANDAU, J.

Claimant petitions for judicial review of a final order of the Employment Appeals Board (board) affirming the Employment Department’s (department) dismissal of her request for a hearing on the denial of her application for unemployment benefits. The department dismissed her hearing request on the ground that it was not signed as required by administrative rule. On review, claimant contends that, although the hearing request was not signed as required by rule, she should be deemed to have “substantially complied” with the requirements of the applicable statute, which contains no such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rogers v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. McComas v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Clausing v. K-Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. StalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. A.F. ex rel. Legaard v. Providence Health PlanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
  3. Spurger v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Haskins v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API