Legal Opinion

Clausing v. K-Mart Corporation

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 20, 1996No. 95-04958; CA A92152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that reinstated K-Mart Corporation’s denial of his claim. ORS 656.298. The question is whether K-Mart is responsible under ORS 656.029(1) for providing workers’ compensation coverage for claimant. The Board concluded that it is not.

Claimant worked for a company that contracted with K-Mart to provide janitorial services. Claimant was injured while cleaning one of K-Mart’s stores. ORS 656.029(1) requires that

“If a person awards a contract involving the performance of labor where such labor is a normal and customary part or process of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haskins v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. K-Mart Corp. v. ClaussingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Haskins v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Sorenson v. LaTourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API