Clausing v. K-Mart Corporation
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that reinstated K-Mart Corporation’s denial of his claim. ORS 656.298. The question is whether K-Mart is responsible under ORS 656.029(1) for providing workers’ compensation coverage for claimant. The Board concluded that it is not.
Claimant worked for a company that contracted with K-Mart to provide janitorial services. Claimant was injured while cleaning one of K-Mart’s stores. ORS 656.029(1) requires that
“If a person awards a contract involving the performance of labor where such labor is a normal and customary part or process of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bronson v. MoonenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- Haskins v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- K-Mart Corp. v. ClaussingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Haskins v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Sorenson v. LaTourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007