Legal Opinion

Bronson v. Moonen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1974PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

The Bronsons filed this suit praying for strict foreclosure of a contract of sale of a building lot to the defendants, the Moonens.. The Moonens filed a cross-complaint praying for a rescission of the contract and restoration of the amounts paid thereunder. The trial court entered a decree providing that unless the defendants, within thirty days from the date of the decree, paid the balance due on the contract of $2,737.50 plus interest, attorney fees of $500 and costs, the contract and all interest of the defendants in the prop erty would be strictly foreclosed. The defendants appeal,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Robb v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Schramm v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. Employee Benefits InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Harsh Investment Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Housing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API