Bronson v. Moonen
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.
The Bronsons filed this suit praying for strict foreclosure of a contract of sale of a building lot to the defendants, the Moonens.. The Moonens filed a cross-complaint praying for a rescission of the contract and restoration of the amounts paid thereunder. The trial court entered a decree providing that unless the defendants, within thirty days from the date of the decree, paid the balance due on the contract of $2,737.50 plus interest, attorney fees of $500 and costs, the contract and all interest of the defendants in the prop erty would be strictly foreclosed. The defendants appeal,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Hunter v. CunningOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Robb v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Schramm v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Yeager v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Mountain Fir Lumber Co. v. Employee Benefits InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Harsh Investment Corp. v. State Ex Rel. State Housing DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.