Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1956No. Civ. 16687PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered on the sustaining without leave to amend of a demurrer to his fourth amended complaint against the administrator of the estate of Elizabeth A. (Green) Rodgers, hereinafter called the decedent. To all four prior drafts demurrers had been sustained with leave to amend. All demurrers contained among other grounds that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that plaintiff had no legal capacity to maintain the action. We have concluded that the fourth amended complaint also suffers from said and other defects.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Owens v. TraversoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Slavin v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Regus v. SchartkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Knoell v. PetrovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Manti v. GunariCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. McGehee v. Arvest Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Campbell v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API