Legal Opinion
United States v. Pennzoil Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 1965No. Civ. A. 65-838PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
The United States of America, plaintiff, brings this action for injunctive relief against Pennzoil Company and Kendall Refining Company, defendants, as based upon the provisions contained in § 7 of the Clayton Act (Act of Congress of October 15, 1914, c. 323, § 7, 38 Stat. 731, December 29, 1950, c. 1184, 64 Stat. 1125, 15 U.S.C. § 18) 1
The action was filed on August 4,1965 to enjoin the consummation of an acquisition agreement of Kendall by Pennzoil on the basis that it violated § 7 of the Clayton Act. As originally filed, the complaint requested a temporary…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Weyerhaeuser CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- State Department of Health & Mental Hygiene v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Mt. Lebanon Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Lazy Oil, Co. v. Witco Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- United States v. Siemens Corporation and G. D. Searle & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.