Lazy Oil, Co. v. Witco Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. ■
Presently pending before the Court in this consolidated antitrust class action suit are several motions, including a motion by the Class to approve a proposed settlement of the lawsuit. Specifically, the Class seeks approval of the proposed settlement agreement and the proposed plan of allocation of the settlement proceeds. In addition, Class Counsel seek an award of $6.35 million in attorneys’ fees and $486,165 in unreimbursed expenses. Various absent class members have objected to the proposed settlement, the proposed allocation plan, and/or…
2Cases cited99 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- In Re Safety Components, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Dehoyos v. Allstate Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- Reibstein v. RITE AID CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.