Legal Opinion

People v. Lujan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 13, 1995No. 94SA289PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The reason for lawyer discipline proceedings such as these is the protection of the public and not punishment of the offending lawyer. The respondent 1 is a lawyer who stole from her law firm, but who nevertheless does not deserve to be disbarred because of certain extraordinary and tragic factors in mitigation, including the sudden emergence of a mental disorder that caused the misconduct. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings and recommendation of a hearing board that the respondent be suspended for one year from the date of the hearing. We accept…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. OgbornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. People v. EasteppSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. People v. MoyaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. LavenharSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. GuyersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. People v. LeflySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. KatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. ShidlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API