Legal Opinion

Miller v. Finley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1872PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Miller sued below upon a joint and several promissory-note. Both defendants pleaded the general issue, and Hugli Finley, junior, appended to his plea an affidavit denying the execution of the note by himself. No notice' of any kind, was filed or served with the plea.

Upon the trial the defense was rested upon several grounds. It was claimed that Hugh Finley, senior, signed the note without the consent of Hugh Finley, junior, his son, who, it was alleged, refused to assent to having him sign, and after the note had been delivered as the sole note of the son. It was further claimed that when he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murray v. LardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  3. Brownell v. . WinnieNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  4. McCaughey v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Muir v. DemareeNew York Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Security Trust & Savings Bank of Charles City v. GleichmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. McIntosh v. Detroit Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Howry v. EppingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Wright v. WallerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API