Legal Opinion
Reeser v. Weaver Bros., Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 13, 1992No. 1280PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolff, Judge.
Treva M. Reeser appeals from a directed verdict granted in favor of Weaver Brothers, Inc. (“Weaver”) on Reeser’s claim to recover damages representing (1) compensation for annoyance and discomfort, and (2) the cost of restoring her injured real property to its pre-injury state. The trial court directed a verdict on the basis that Reeser was not entitled, as a matter of law, to recover compensation for annoyance and discomfort, or restoration costs. Reeser appeals from this judgment, advancing three assignments of error. Weaver has cross-appealed, claiming that the trial court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Henderson v. Spring Run AllotmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Martin v. Design Construction Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
- Horrisberger v. MohlmasterOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Booth v. Duffy Homes, Inc., 07ap-680 (10-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Allen Hogan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.