Legal Opinion

Martin v. Design Construction Services, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2009No. Nos. 2007-2023 and 2007-2024PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

I

{¶ 1} The Ninth District Court of Appeals certified the following issue pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution and App.R. 25: “[I]n an action *67for temporary damages to a noncommercial real property, [is] a failure to prove the difference between the fair market value of the whole property just before the damage was done and immediately thereafter * * * fatal to the claim?”

{¶ 2} For the following reasons, we answer the question in the negative and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

II

{¶ 3} This case concerns a home built by Design Construction Services, Inc.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apel v. KatzOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Northwestern Ohio Natural Gas Co. v. First Congregational ChurchOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Reeser v. Weaver Bros., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Adcock v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Coles v. GranvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Langlois v. Town of ProctorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  2. Northpointe Properties v. Charter One BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Casper Lodging, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Legacy Builders, LLC, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company and Joe Seneshale, an individualWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ohio Edison Co. v. RoyerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API