Legal Opinion
Horrisberger v. Mohlmaster
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 1995No. 2904PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Judge.
Defendants-appellants, Ralph and Paul Mohlmaster, appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs-appellees, Oscar and Eunice Horrisberger, on the plaintiffs’ claim for unreasonable interference with surface water flow. Upon review, we vacate the judgment against Paul Mohlmaster, reverse the judgment against Ralph Mohlmaster, and remand the cause against Ralph Mohlmaster for a new trial on damages only.
Since 1977, Ralph Mohlmaster has resided on a parcel of property on the west side of State Route 585 in Marshallville. 1 The plaintiffs own a sixty-acre farm located on the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cabe v. LunichOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Norwood v. SheenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- McGlashan v. Spade Rockledge Terrace Condo Development Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Henderson v. Spring Run AllotmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Reeser v. Weaver Bros., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. HollandOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lubanovich v. McGlocklinOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Baaron, Inc. v. DavidsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Banford v. Aldrich Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Alford v. E. Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.