Legal Opinion

State v. Fleck

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 26, 2011No. A10-681PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of second-degree assault, arguing that the district court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the defense of voluntary intoxication. Because we conclude that the district court erred by not giving this instruction, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

At approximately 1:00 a.m. on January 23, 2009, K.W. returned to the home that she shared with appellant Ronald G. Fleck and found appellant in the kitchen, drinking. According to K.W., appellant had been drinking for “seven days straight.” K.W. went into the bathroom but…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. LindahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. CoggerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API