Legal Opinion

State v. Fleck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 2012No. A10-0681PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYER, Justice.

The issue presented is whether under Minn.Stat. § 609.075 (2010), a defendant is entitled to a voluntary intoxication jury instruction, when the State alleges an assault committed by the infliction of bodily harm (assault-harm). The State charged Ronald Gene Fleck with second-degree assault after he stabbed his former girlfriend. Fleck pleaded not guilty and demanded a jury trial. After all the evidence was presented to the jury, the district court submitted two forms of assault to the jurors: (1) assault-fear, Minn.Stat. § 609.02, subd. 10(1) (2010) (prohibiting an act…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. City of Minneapolis v. AltimusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. State v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State of Minnesota v. Thomas Raymond StruzykSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. GaddieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API