State v. Shoop
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
By majority decision, the court of appeals reversed the second-degree intentional murder conviction of David Shoop and granted him a new trial. State v. Shoop, 429 N.W.2d 259 (Minn.App.1988). It ruled that the trial court erred in denying a request to instruct the jury on the accomplice corroboration requirement and that because the harmless error doctrine has no application, the error required a new trial without regard to the total evidence adduced at trial. Shoop, 429 N.W.2d at 261-63. Although we agree that the trial court erred in denying the defense request, we hold that…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.