Legal Opinion

State v. Shoop

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1989No. C2-87-2209PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

By majority decision, the court of appeals reversed the second-degree intentional murder conviction of David Shoop and granted him a new trial. State v. Shoop, 429 N.W.2d 259 (Minn.App.1988). It ruled that the trial court erred in denying a request to instruct the jury on the accomplice corroboration requirement and that because the harmless error doctrine has no application, the error required a new trial without regard to the total evidence adduced at trial. Shoop, 429 N.W.2d at 261-63. Although we agree that the trial court erred in denying the defense request, we hold that…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  2. State v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API