Legal Opinion
State v. Vance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 12, 2007No. A05-459PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
A Dakota County jury found Michael Neal Vance guilty of third-degree assault and making terroristic threats. The district court entered convictions for both offenses, and after finding that they were part of the same course of conduct, sentenced Vance to 24 months in prison for the third-degree assault conviction. Vance appealed his convictions claiming, among *653other things, that the court erred when it failed to instruct the jury on the definition of assault, thereby omitting the element of intent from the instructions. The Minnesota Court of Appeals affirmed…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. MiltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. CarridineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. KuhlmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.