Legal Opinion
Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1982No. 82-85PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Wilma Hannah, the wife of police officer Delbert Hannah, brought this action under Minn.Stat. § 340.95 (1980), the Civil Damage Act (Dram Shop Act), in order to recover for damage to her means of support when her husband was injured in the line of duty by an intoxicated person to whom respondents Chmielewski and the Red Carpet Bar had served alcoholic beverages. 1 The Stearns County District Court granted respondents’ motions for summary judgment, concluding that Wilma Hannah’s claim was governed by Hannah v. Jensen, 298 N.W.2d 52 (Minn.1980) (Hannah I), where we held that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Hahn v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of IsleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Osborne v. Twin Town Bowl, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Thompson v. Dewey's South Royalton, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Lang v. GlusicaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Lang v. GlusicaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.