Legal Opinion

Lang v. Glusica

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1986No. C0-85-1846PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition by plaintiff policeman, Ronald Lang, for review of a 2-1 decision of the Court of Appeals holding that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a directed verdict by defendant Robert Glusica, who injured plaintiff while resisting arrest. The Court of Appeals ruled that the common law “fireman’s rule” barred recovery by plaintiff from defendant Glusica. Lang v. Glusica, 387 N.W.2d 895 (Minn.App.1986). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

On December 1, 1980, defendant Glusica and his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Hannah v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Shypulski v. Waldorf Paper Products Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Hannah v. Chmielewski, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kreski v. Modern Wholesale Electric Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Carson v. HeadrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sanders v. GhristSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Benefiel v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. Ballou v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API