Legal Opinion
Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. a & a Liquors of St. Cloud
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 20, 2002No. C7-02-327PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R.A. RANDALL, Judge.
In this dram-shop action, appellant moved for a declaration that he was entitled to loss-of-means-of-support coverage under the liquor establishment’s liquor-liability policy for the reduction in his standard of living pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 340A.801 (2000). The district court denied his motion, and this appeal followed. Respondent also filed a notice of review, contending that appellant did not have standing to bring this declaratory-judgment motion and that this action is not the appropriate vehicle to present this claim because appellant can proceed by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bodah v. Lakeville Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Peterson v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006