Legal Opinion

State v. Ewing

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 5, 2000No. 44735-1-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.

— An insurance company that pays benefits to a crime victim suffers a loss as a direct result of the crime, and a sentencing court may order the offender to pay restitution to the insurance company without regard to whether the company could pursue a civil subrogation claim.

FACTS

Douglas Ewing and Susan Ewing were married for 12 years. They separated on December 15, 1997. By April 1998, both had signed a property agreement under which Susan Ewing would receive, among other things, the family home and real property, the household goods and furnish*351ings, and the homeowner’s insurance policy.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. State v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. KinnemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API