State v. Ewing
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtEllington, J.
— An insurance company that pays benefits to a crime victim suffers a loss as a direct result of the crime, and a sentencing court may order the offender to pay restitution to the insurance company without regard to whether the company could pursue a civil subrogation claim.
FACTS
Douglas Ewing and Susan Ewing were married for 12 years. They separated on December 15, 1997. By April 1998, both had signed a property agreement under which Susan Ewing would receive, among other things, the family home and real property, the household goods and furnish*351ings, and the homeowner’s insurance policy.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. KinnemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.