Legal Opinion

State v. Ewing

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 5, 2000No. 44735-1-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

7 P.3d 835 (2000)

102 Wash.App. 349

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Douglas Scott EWING, Appellant.

No. 44735-1-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

September 5, 2000.

James Dixon & Robert Weppner, Seattle, for Appellant.

E. Bradford Bales, Seattle, for Respondent.

ELLINGTON, J.

An insurance company that pays benefits to a crime victim suffers a loss as a direct result of the crime, and a sentencing court may order the offender to pay restitution to the insurance company without regard to whether the company could pursue a civil subrogation claim.

FACTS

Douglas Ewing and Susan Ewing were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BarrWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. State v. EdelmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. KinnemanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. State v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API