Legal Opinion

Heit v. Livingston

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided June 30, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00507Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO WARREN HEIT AND DEB HEIT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00507-BLW Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. SCOTT LIVINGSTON AND SHARI LIVINGSTON, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Warren and Deb Heit’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. 48). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion. BACKGROUND The Heits and the Livingstons own neighboring properties on a steep hillside in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho. Def. Stmt. of Facts at ¶ 3, Dkt. 36-1. For over a decade, both properties have relied on the use of a shared tram…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Irwin Rogers Insurance Agency, Inc. v. MurphyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Atwood v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API