Atwood v. Smith
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
This is an appeal from the district court’s orders which denied the Smiths’ motion to amend, determined that the Smiths violated restrictive covenants by operating a daycare in their home, and granted an injunction requiring the cessation of the Smiths’ daycare. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I
Shelly and Joseph Smith entered into a purchase agreement on June 21, 2001, to acquire approximately 2.5 acres in a Nampa subdivision. The subdivision is zoned as rural residential. The Smiths’ lot was the fourth and final lot in the subdivision. These lots are governed by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sprinkler Irrigation Co., Inc. v. JOHN DEERE INS. COMPANY, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Maroun v. Wyreless Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Clark v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Budget Truck Sales, LLC v. TilleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Porter v. BassettIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Vawter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Allen v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Keybank National Ass'n v. Pal I, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.