Thomas v. Arkoosh Produce, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
I. NATURE OF THE CASE
This is an appeal by Matthew Thomas as a personal representative of the Estate of Daniel Thomas (Estate) from a court trial in which the district judge found in favor of the Estate on a promissory note, but declined to award prejudgment interest based on equitable defenses. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1988, Greenhorn Farms, which was an entity owned by brothers Tom Arkoosh (“Tom”) and Jim Arkoosh (“Jim”) became involved in a dispute with J.R. Simplot Co. (“Simplot”) over the amount charged by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ZimmermanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Tommerup v. Albertson's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Smith v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Atwood v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Access Behavioral Health v. IDHWIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Lane Ranch Partnership v. City of Sun ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Horton v. HortonIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Litster Frost v. Idaho Injury Law GroupIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.