Board of Education v. Martin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff brought this action for the recovery from the defendants of a parcel of land in San Francisco, claimed by it to have been reserved as a school lot under the provisions of the Van Ness ordinance, and to belong to the school department of that city. The defendants, in their answer, in addition to denying the title of the plaintiff, alleged title in themselves, and pleaded as a special defense to the action the statute of limitations, and also pleaded a former judgment recovered by their predecessors against the city and county of San Francisco, as a bar to the plaintiff’s *211right of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- San Francisco City and County v. Le RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Townsend v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- County of Yolo v. BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People ex rel. Bryant v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.