Legal Opinion

Hoadley v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875No. 3142PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The two parcels of land in controversy in this action are thus described: First.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The two parcels of land in controversy in this action are thus described: First. Commencing at the point of intersection of the northern line of Clay street with the eastern line of Scott street, running thence northerly along the last-named line two hundred and seventy-five (275) feet, more or less, to the north line or boundary of the “Hoadley Claim;” running thence in a line due east along the north line of the “ Hoadley Claim ” to its intersection with the western line of Pierce street; thence…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

This action was brought to quiet the title of the plaintiff to two pieces of land, one of which forms a part of Alta Plaza, and the other a part of Hamilton Square, as laid down on the maps of the city. The plaintiff claims title under the Van Ress Ordinance and the confirmatory act of March 11, 1858 (Stats. 1858, p. 52), and the act of Congress of July 1, 1864, by which the title of the United States was relinquished and granted to the city for the uses and purposes specified in the act of March 11, 1858, and he also *272claims title by adverse possession. The defense is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rung v. ShonebergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
  2. Commonwealth v. AlburgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  3. City of San Francisco v. CalderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Gardiner v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Buntin v. City of DanvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  5. People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API