Legal Opinion
Hoskins v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 27, 1998No. 95-844CPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FACTS
The plaintiff, Richard E. Hoskins, II, entered active duty with the United States Army on June 9, 1982 and was separated from the Army on June 30, 1993. Mr. Hos-kins filed a complaint with this court which requests the defendant to set aside the bar to reenlistment and involuntary separation imposed on June 30, 1993 under the Army’s Qualitative Management Program (QMP); to correct his military records, including removal of derogatory information from his personnel records; and for permission to apply for reenlistment in the Army. Mr. Hoskins’ final enlistment was for a…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Mantech Telecommunications & Information Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Overstreet Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Peoples v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Milas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.