Legal Opinion
Martinez v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 29, 2007No. 06-797CPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
I. RELEVANT FACTS.1
On August 15, 1984, Plaintiff enlisted in the United States Army and was assigned to work as a medical officer. See AR at 5. On August 31, 2000, following a “comprehensive review” of Plaintiffs Official Military Personnel Files (“OMPF”), pursuant to the Army’s Qualitative Management Program (“QMP”),2 the Sergeant First Class Qualitative Management Program Promotion Board (“QMP Board”) advised Plaintiff of a decision to discharge and bar her from reenlistment. Id. at 182. In suppoi't, four Noncommis-sioned Officer Evaluation…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hwang v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Hale v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Neutze v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.