Davis v. State
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
— Joseph Davis seeks compensation from the State of Washington for the injuries he sustained when the *180motorcycle he was riding overturned. Davis had been riding at a state-owned recreation area. The trial court granted the State’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the State was immune from tort liability under the recreational use statute, RCW 4.24.200 and .210. Davis argues that he followed motorcycle tracks in the sand leading to a drop-off and that the tracks constituted a known dangerous artificial latent condition for which the State is liable. We disagree and, thus, affirm.
Facts
O…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Tennyson v. Plum Creek Timber Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Swinehart v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Swinehart v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Davis v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Davis v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Garza v. McCain Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.