Legal Opinion

Swinehart v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 15, 2008No. 26443-2-IIIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kulik, A.C.J.

¶1 Under the recreational use statute, RCW 4.24.200 and .210, landowners who allow the public to use their land for recreational purposes are generally immune from liability. An exception to the general immunity is for injury-causing conditions that are latent. William Swinehart and Heidi Swinehart brought this action seeking damages for back injuries he sustained after sliding down the “Red Wagon” slide at Riverfront Park in Spokane, Washington.

¶2 Mr. Swinehart argues that the improperly maintained playground fill constituted a latent condition. We disagree because the condition…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ruff v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Barrie v. Hosts of America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Kahn v. SalernoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Steinbock v. FERRY COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  2. Cox v. OASIS PHYSICAL THERAPY, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Cox v. Oasis Physical Therapy, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Jewels v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Citibank (South Dakota), NA v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API