Tennyson v. Plum Creek Timber Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*552Coleman, J.
— Kevin Tennyson appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Plum Creek Timber Co., C. Wyss & Son, Inc., Blue Dot Excavating, Inc., and Lumsden Logging, Inc., "the contractors”. Tennyson contends that (1) the altered gravel mound was "latent” as a matter of law under RCW 4.24.210,1 (2) the contractors may not claim immunity under RCW 4.24.210, and (3) the completion and acceptance doctrine does not relieve the contractors from liability. We affirm.2
On August 4,1991, Tennyson was injured while riding his off-road motorcycle on land owned by Plum Creek Timber…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Gaeta v. Seattle City LightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Labree v. Millville Mfg., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Rhea v. Grandview School District No. JT 116-200Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Andrews v. Del GuzziWashington Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Anthony D. Hardnett v. Charles D. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Camicia v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- Chamberlain v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Widman v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.