Legal Opinion

Van Dinter v. City of Kennewick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1993No. 59275-6PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

Duane Van Dinter was injured when he struck his eye on a rod protruding from a piece of playground equipment at a Kennewick city park. The trial court dismissed Van Dinter's negligence action against Kennewick on the ground that the City is immune under Washington's recreational use statute, RCW 4.24.210. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We affirm the Court of Appeals.

I

On August 4, 1989, Van Dinter attended a birthday party at a park in Kennewick. Located in this park is a caterpillar-shaped piece of playground equipment designed for children to climb on. The "caterpillar" sits inside an area…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Green River Community College District No. 10 v. Higher Education Personnel BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gaeta v. Seattle City LightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. McKinnon v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Degel v. Majestic Mobile Manor, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Iwai v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API