In re Tansel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16 to 20, inclusive, 34, 35,. and 38 to 44, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent on photographic printing apparatus. Claim 9 is representative of the appealed claims and reads:
9. In photographic printing apparatus, in combination, a carrier, means for mounting the .carrier, for continuous rotation during operation, á motor for *835rotating the'carrier continuously, a plurality of fonts of characters on said,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Application of BeachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Cooper v. HubbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Garand v. PedersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jeffrey R. Sewall and Ronald G. Walters v. Ronald G. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Vernon C. Applegate and John H. Howell v. Otto Scherer, Heinz Frensch and Gerhard StählerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Edward Fredkin v. Eugene H. IrasekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Warren W. Fitzgerald v. ArbibCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.