Application of Cecil L. Tansel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 9, 10, 11, 13,14, 16 to 20, inclusive, 34, 35, and 38 to 44, inclusive, of appellant’s application for a patent on photographic printing apparatus. Claim 9 is representative of the appealed claims and reads:
“9. In photographic printing apparatus in combination, a carrier, .means for mounting the carrier for continuous rotation during operation, a motor for rotating the carrier continuously, a plurality of fonts of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
- Application of BeachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
- Tansel v. HigonnetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Cooper v. HubbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969