Legal Opinion

Waugh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1999PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This Court granted allocatur in the above-referenced matter in order to address whether an insurance company is entitled to set aside a Notice of Compensation Payable (“NCP”) on the grounds that an employer’s intentional misrepresentation as to the claimant’s residency at the time of the injury constituted a material mistake of fact. For the reason that follow, we reverse the Commonwealth Court and conclude that an insurance company is entitled to set aside the NCP in these circumstances.

The facts relevant to this appeal are that on December 18, 1993,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Barna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Hartner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bowser v. BlomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Crozer Chester Medical Center v. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Health Care Services Review DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API