Legal Opinion

Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 2000No. Supreme Court, 118 M.D. Appeal Docket 1997PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Borough of Swarthmore from the Commonwealth Court’s order reversing the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, which denied benefits to James Davis, a former police officer for the Borough. We granted the Borough’s petition for allowance of appeal to address the issue of the standard to be applied to claims for workers’ compensation benefits when the claimant asserts that a psychic injury is manifested through both psychic and physical symptoms. We hold that where a psychic injury is claimed, regardless of whether it is manifested…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Wilson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Heath v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Heath v. WCAB (BD. OF PROB. AND PAR.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Craftsmen v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. RAG (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, L.P. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API