Bowser v. Blom
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Justice CASTILLE.
This Court granted allowance of appeal in this domestic relations/support matter limited to a question of first impression: the proper interpretation of the counsel fee provision governing support proceedings under the Domestic Relations Code, i.e., 23 Pa.C.S. § 4351. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to assess counsel fees against appellee in this case pursuant to § 4351(a) and, accordingly, we affirm. In so holding, we take the opportunity to address the appropriate factors for a trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Costello v. LeNoirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Women's Homoeopathic Hospital of Philadelphia CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. BurnsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Sphere Drake Insurance v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Walker v. ElebySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.