State v. McDermott
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 570.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCDERMOTT; LAWRENCE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. McDermott,
1995-Ohio-80.] R.C. 2317.02(A) provides the exclusive means by which privileged communications directly between an attorney and a client can be waived. R.C. 2317.02(A) provides the exclusive means by which privileged communications directly between an attorney and a client can be waived. (Swetland v. Miles [1920], 101 Ohio St. 501, 130 N.E. 22, paragraph three of the syllabus followed; State v. Post [1987], 32 Ohio St.3d…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. SmorgalaOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Williamson Heater. Co. v. RadichOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. McDermottOhio Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Air-Ride v. Dhl Express (Usa), Ca2008-01-001 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Watson v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Perrella v. SpitzOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Boddy v. Xenia Community City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026
- State v. BrinkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2026