Legal Opinion

State v. McDermott

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 1994-0461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 72 Ohio St.3d 570.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MCDERMOTT; LAWRENCE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. McDermott,

1995-Ohio-80.] R.C. 2317.02(A) provides the exclusive means by which privileged communications directly between an attorney and a client can be waived. R.C. 2317.02(A) provides the exclusive means by which privileged communications directly between an attorney and a client can be waived. (Swetland v. Miles [1920], 101 Ohio St. 501, 130 N.E. 22, paragraph three of the syllabus followed; State v. Post [1987], 32 Ohio St.3d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. SmorgalaOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Williamson Heater. Co. v. RadichOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State v. McDermottOhio Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Air-Ride v. Dhl Express (Usa), Ca2008-01-001 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Watson v. Cuyahoga Metro. Hous. Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Perrella v. SpitzOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Boddy v. Xenia Community City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State v. BrinkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API